PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Result: Increased awareness, demand and utilization of PMTCT services. AED is to develop and implement
a national PMTCT social marketing campaign that will increase the level of knowledge about PMTCT, foster
positive attitudes, promote HIV testing, and increase utilization of PMTCT services.
Inputs
Through a Task Order from the USG, AED will provide technical assistance and support to Family Health
Division of Ministry of Health to implement a national PMTCT social marketing campaign for Botswana.
Activities/Outputs
AED will implement the following activities: develop and launch a new PMTCT logo, conduct a media
campaign, develop, print and distribute IEC materials, design and print new PMTCT patient folders and
referral cards and regularly monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the campaign. This will increase the
level of knowledge about PMTCT, foster positive attitudes, promote HIV testing, increase utilization of
PMTCT services and promote support for HIV positive pregnant women amongst key target audiences.
Outcomes
The expected benefit to the program is an increase in the number of pregnant women tested for HIV and
utilizing full PMTCT services, including replacement feeding, with increased support from partners, families
and communities.
New Total Funding Request (July 11,2005):
Two main reasons:
1)The context has changed. Due to the introduction of routine HIV testing in Botswana, the uptake of HIV
testing by pregnant women has increased and is >80%, so the priority for a large and comprehensive social
marketing campaign highlighting the importance of HIV testing during pregnancy is no longer an issue.
2)The contractor did not perform according to international standards. Personality issues arose between
staff of the AED team and the team from the MoH that were difficult to resolve.
This is supplemental funding to Program Area Code 09 Budget Code HVCT during the period of January to
September 2005. Our prelimnary consultation with the contractor revealed that their operation cost for
capacity development is significantly deficient. This funding is anticipated to strengthen activities listed
under the program and yield similar outputs and outcomes.
